Portland (OR) Disparities
(Feb. 21, 2015; rev. Mar. 31, 2015)
Prefatory note: This subpage is related to the California Disparities, Maryland Disparities, Beaverton, OR Disparities, Los Angeles SWPBS, Denver Disparities, Minneapolis Disparities, Montgomery County, MD Disparities, St. Paul Disparities, Henrico County, VA Disparities, Connecticut Disparities, DOE Equity Report, Suburban Disparities, and Preschool Disparities subpages of the Discipline Disparities page of jpscanlan.com. The first ten subpages address studies showing that when discipline rates were reduced in the referenced jurisdictions, relative racial/ethnic differences in discipline rates increased. The DOE Equity Report subpage addresses a Department of Education study showing that relative RACIAL differences in expulsions are smaller in districts with zero tolerance policies than in districts without zero tolerance policies. The Suburban Disparities and Preschool Disparities subpages addresses the fact that relative racial differences in discipline rates tend to be greater in suburbs than in central cities, and in preschool than K-12, simply because discipline rates tend to be lower in suburbs than in central cities and preschool than K-12.
Useful background reading for this page include “Misunderstanding of Statistics Leads to Misguided Law Enforcement Policies, ” Amstat News (Dec. 2012), “The Paradox of Lowering Standards,” Baltimore Sun (Aug. 5, 2013), “Things government doesn’t know about racial disparities,” The Hill (Jan. 28, 2014), and “Race and Mortality Revisited,” Society (July/Aug. 2014). All address the fact that contrary to the view promoted by the Departments of Education and Justice that reducing discipline rates will tend to reduce racial and ethnic differences in discipline rates, reducing discipline rates will tend to increase relative racial differences in discipline rates (though reduce relative differences in rates of avoiding discipline). My recent “The Perverse Enforcement of Fair Lending Law,” Mortgage Banking (May 2014) addresses the same issue in the lending context. The statistical issues have also been recently addressed in my November 17, 2014 amicus curiae brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Development, et al. v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., Supreme Court No. 13-1731.
Note added March 31, 2015: I recently explained this issue to the Portland Board of Education by letter of February 25, 2015, and by letter of March 20, 2015, to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions by letter of March 20, 2015. The latter item pertains to the legislation discussed on the Keep Kids in School Act subpage.
***